'Veterans Hide Because They Are Afraid': New Testimony Raises Concerns Over LGBTQ+ Safety

Timothy Pena • June 26, 2026

Privacy, violence, and institutional apathy discourage vulnerable veterans from seeking life-saving services.

*"Disclaimer: Some content in this article was generated with the assistance of artificial intelligence.


NEW YORK -- A week of testimony before the New York City Council has renewed questions about conditions at the DHS MICA shelter, Borden Avenue Veterans Residence, with one disabled Navy veteran arguing that the city's only federally funded Veterans Affairs Grant and Per Diem (GPD) transitional housing program run by Institute for Community Living continues to expose vulnerable veterans to unnecessary risks.


The testimony focused on the experiences of LGBTQ+ veterans and veterans living with HIV, asserting that concerns about safety, privacy, and access to health care remain largely overlooked despite years of documented complaints and repeated emergency responses at the facility.


Privacy Becomes a Barrier to Care


Veterans seeking supportive housing through the HIV/AIDS Services Administration (HASA) often must disclose highly sensitive medical information while living in a congregate shelter.


According to Timothy Pena, a former Borden Avenue resident who spent five months in the program, that lack of privacy can discourage veterans from seeking treatment altogether.


"I consider myself heterosexual," Pena testified. "Yet merely being HIV-positive creates opportunities for people to make assumptions and then act upon those prejudices."


Pena told the Council that another veteran recently told him the only reason he obtained permanent housing was because he had AIDS. While he described the comment as deeply offensive, he said it illustrates how quickly stigma can develop inside a shelter environment where personal information is difficult to keep private.


He argued that fear of disclosure extends beyond housing. Veterans may hesitate to seek HIV treatment through the Department of Veterans Affairs or inquire about specialized services because they fear their medical information—or assumptions about it—will spread throughout the shelter.


Violence Continues to Define Daily Life


Pena described losing twenty-four pounds during his stay at Borden Avenue while witnessing assaults, overdoses, repeated ambulance responses, and veterans sleeping outside because they believed it was safer than remaining inside the facility. His earlier account similarly described an environment marked by violence, frequent police activity, and inadequate communication regarding veterans' housing and VA benefits.


Public records appear to reinforce concerns about the volume of crises at the residence. Approximately 1,365 emergency calls were associated with Borden Avenue between August 2024 and December 2025, involving assaults, emotionally disturbed persons, injuries, unconscious individuals, and suspected overdoses.


Veterans have also recently reported what they believe to be an ongoing tick infestation at the facility, describing repeated bites and discarded donated clothing and bedding because they feared contamination. Those reports have not been publicly confirmed by city agencies.


Questions About Veteran Priorities


Beyond conditions inside the shelter, Pena questioned whether local veteran leadership has placed sufficient emphasis on protecting vulnerable veterans.


He argued that public discussions by the Committee on Veterans and several veteran-serving organizations often concentrate on disability claims, discharge upgrades, and benefits enrollment while giving comparatively little public attention to the physical safety of veterans living in congregate housing.


According to Pena, this imbalance leaves some homeless veterans feeling that their experiences are valuable primarily as evidence of need rather than as urgent problems requiring immediate action. He contends that the success of veteran programs should be measured not only by claims processed or benefits awarded, but also by whether veterans feel safe enough to seek medical treatment, disclose sensitive health information, and trust the institutions established to serve them.


A Continuing Question of Accountability


The concerns raised this week are not new. Complaints regarding management, safety, and oversight at Borden Avenue date back more than fifteen years. In 2008, residents publicly criticized treatment by city officials and raised concerns about management following a Department of Homeless Services operation. In 2022, Queens Community Board 2 similarly criticized the Department of Homeless Services over shelter oversight and resident safety, including conditions affecting the Borden Avenue Veterans Residence.


For Pena, those earlier warnings, combined with his recent testimony, point to a broader issue of trust.


"If veterans believe their privacy will not be protected or that their safety is a secondary concern," he told the Council, "they stop identifying themselves, they stop seeking treatment, and they stop asking for help."


As city officials continue to debate veteran homelessness, the testimony challenges policymakers to consider whether transitional housing is truly fulfilling its intended purpose—not only by providing a bed, but by providing an environment where every veteran can safely begin rebuilding a life.



Timothy Pena is a service-connected disabled Navy veteran for PTSD and has written about his experiences with mental health, homelessness, and the judicial system. Pena initially visited NYC to collaborate on a documentary for veteran suicide but decided to stay after realizing he would rather be homeless in NYC than dead in Phoenix. He has been writing stories and blogs about his journey from “homeless to homeness” in the NYC Dept of Homeless Services system and possible corruption within DHS, Institute for Community Living, and Veterans Affairs Grant & Per Diem Transitional Program.