When the bankruptcy email surfaced days later, Pena forwarded it to Matthews, seeking an explanation. Matthews replied that he “had no prior knowledge” of Ashton’s financial troubles but later wrote that “Jerry will be scaling back his fundraising efforts.” Matthews offered no clarification on whether donors were to be informed or whether SI PPS has plans to review the partnership.
The email misfire also raises broader ethical questions. Ashton’s public persona as a debt abolitionist stands in sharp contrast to his private financial collapse. Over the summer, he had received the Pillar Award at the Whistleblower Summit and Film Festival for his work in debt reform. At the time, he was lauded by SI PPS as a “truth-teller” and “leader in veteran reform”—even as he was negotiating with creditors and preparing for bankruptcy.
Text messages from July show Pena confronting Ashton over his lack of support for Pena’s own whistleblower case of “misconduct and misappropriation of federal funds,” with the Veterans Affairs Grant and Per Diem program to which Ashton responded, “That’s your work, Tim,” texting, “Debt is my world, whether civilian or veteran. I’m sorry you don’t respect that.”
If Ashton harbored resentments about Pena’s concerns, he never voiced them. He personally scheduled Pena to lead a roundtable and moderate the opening panel, “Field Experience,”—a session focused on veteran incarceration, homelessness, and debt—only to abruptly remove him from the lineup less than 24 hours before the summit.
The decision blindsided Pena and came without explanation or warning, effectively erasing a veteran voice from an event marketed as empowering those very perspectives.
Despite Ashton’s promise in an email to “remedy my mistakes,” the damage was done. “For the first time since coming to New York City, I woke up the next morning overwhelmed by betrayal and suicidal thoughts,” Pena wrote in his letter to AFSP. “This is what happens when non-veterans profit from veteran suffering.”
As of late October, SI PPS has not issued a public statement addressing Ashton’s bankruptcy or clarifying the financial status of the End Veteran Debt initiative. Matthews has said only that discussions are underway to “evaluate next steps.”
Meanwhile, the controversy has cast a long shadow over what was billed as a groundbreaking “Civ-Vet” partnership between civilians and veterans. Instead, it now serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked trust in charismatic nonprofit leaders and the urgent need for stronger financial oversight within the veteran services sector.
Printable pdf: Errant Email Exposes End Veteran Debt Founder Bankruptcy and Collections (4 pgs)


 
 